Difference between revisions of "News:Adding References"
J.waldmann (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Peter''': If you refer to choosing the Identifier, I would propose name+year[+a-z] for single author papers | '''Peter''': If you refer to choosing the Identifier, I would propose name+year[+a-z] for single author papers | ||
and initials+year[+a-z] for multi author papers. If you refer to the reference itself, the usual BibTeX formats should be supported. | and initials+year[+a-z] for multi author papers. If you refer to the reference itself, the usual BibTeX formats should be supported. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Johannes: I am not sure I like this "references" section, because it duplicates information | + | '''Harald''': Thx, I referred to the identifier |
| + | |||
| + | '''Johannes''': I am not sure I like this "references" section, because it duplicates information | ||
(see [[Contribute]]) that is (partially) available elsewhere ([http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/ DBLP]). | (see [[Contribute]]) that is (partially) available elsewhere ([http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/ DBLP]). | ||
The logical conclusion then would be to just link to DBLP entries where this is possible, | The logical conclusion then would be to just link to DBLP entries where this is possible, | ||
and copy the DBLP entry format (including their naming scheme) most closely for the others. | and copy the DBLP entry format (including their naming scheme) most closely for the others. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Harald''': I had the same opinion first. But DBLP is a bit slow sometimes ... | ||
| + | |date=April 7, 2008 | ||
| + | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:04, 8 April 2008
April 7, 2008
Harald: Is there a general format which one should use when adding (one's) publications? I think that should be fixed soon in order to ensure a uniform layout.
Peter: If you refer to choosing the Identifier, I would propose name+year[+a-z] for single author papers and initials+year[+a-z] for multi author papers. If you refer to the reference itself, the usual BibTeX formats should be supported.
Harald: Thx, I referred to the identifier
Johannes: I am not sure I like this "references" section, because it duplicates information (see Contribute) that is (partially) available elsewhere (DBLP). The logical conclusion then would be to just link to DBLP entries where this is possible, and copy the DBLP entry format (including their naming scheme) most closely for the others.
Harald: I had the same opinion first. But DBLP is a bit slow sometimes ...
