Difference between revisions of "Termination Competition Steering Committee"
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* a committee, representing all research groups, influences the design and the running of the competition. | * a committee, representing all research groups, influences the design and the running of the competition. | ||
| − | Currently, the Competition is hosted | + | Currently, the Competition is hosted on StarExec. |
| − | |||
The Competition Committee currently | The Competition Committee currently | ||
consists of | consists of | ||
| − | Jürgen Giesl, | + | * [https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/automation-of-logic/people/florian-frohn/ Florian Frohn], MPI Saarbrücken |
| − | + | * [https://verify.rwth-aachen.de/giesl/ Jürgen Giesl], RWTH Aachen | |
| + | * [http://cl-informatik.uibk.ac.at/users/georg/ Georg Moser], University of Innsbruck | ||
| + | * [https://www.cs.upc.edu/~albert/ Albert Rubio] (Chair), UPC Barcelona | ||
| + | * [https://group-mmm.org/~ayamada/ Akihisa Yamada], NII Tokyo | ||
[[Termination_Competition_Steering_Committee_Bylaws]] | [[Termination_Competition_Steering_Committee_Bylaws]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:30, 21 October 2019
The basic ideas are:
- one research group hosts (implements, executes) the competition
- a committee, representing all research groups, influences the design and the running of the competition.
Currently, the Competition is hosted on StarExec.
The Competition Committee currently consists of
- Florian Frohn, MPI Saarbrücken
- Jürgen Giesl, RWTH Aachen
- Georg Moser, University of Innsbruck
- Albert Rubio (Chair), UPC Barcelona
- Akihisa Yamada, NII Tokyo
Termination_Competition_Steering_Committee_Bylaws
The steering committee assembled on June 3rd, 2009, during the Workshop on Termination in Leipzig.
Current Votes
Proposed Votes
The Competition Committee should vote on ... (give only some keywords here, link to separate page if necessary. Discussion shall be on termtools.)
Earlier Votes / Issues resolved otherwise
(otherwise = These topics were discussed on the mailing list, some solution emerged and no-one objected.)
- (asked 31-Oct-2008) what is the timeout that will be applied
for verification (by coqc) of the termination certificates:
<poll> Timemout for verification 1 minute 3 minutes 10 minutes </poll>
deadline for voting: Monday 3-Nov 12:00 noon CET.
See discussion at http://lists.lri.fr/pipermail/termtools/2008-October/000594.html
Resolution: 1 minute timeout.
- When should the competition start? (asked 30-Oct-2008) http://lists.lri.fr/pipermail/termtools/2008-October/000589.html
Resolution (31-Oct-2008): competition starts Tuesday 4-Nov-2008 12:00 noon. The deadline for submission of tool implementations is one hour before the competition starts.
- what should be the timeout (for all categories, except complexity): 60 sec or 120 sec ?
Deadline: October 30 , 4 p.m. CET. Resolution: three votes for 60 seconds, two votes for 120 seconds.
- What is the status of Coccinelle/Coq? (27-Oct-2008) Current Coccinelle requires coq-8.2-trunk.
Resolution (30-Oct-2008): there is a Coccinelle version that works with coq-8.2beta4
- What is the procedure/deadline for submission of new (public) examples to the TPDB? (13-Oct-2008)
Resolution (30-Oct-2008) no bulk submissions before 1-November deadline. But see next item.
- What about submission of (late/secret) problems? (29-Oct-2008)
Resolution (30-Oct-2008): submit until October 31, 10 am CET. see http://lists.lri.fr/pipermail/termtools/2008-October/000585.html
- Are the categories LP and FP part of the upcoming competition?
(13-Oct-2008) http://lists.lri.fr/pipermail/termtools/2008-October/000519.html
YES.
- Will there be a SRS-certified category?
(10-Oct-2008)
YES
- Will certificates be accepted that are verifiable only with Coq-8.2beta4 (and not with 8.1)?
(10-Oct-2008) http://lists.lri.fr/pipermail/termtools/2008-October/000514.html
YES
