Difference between revisions of "Integer Term Rewriting"
From Termination-Portal.org
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
pre-defined semantics for function symbols. | pre-defined semantics for function symbols. | ||
Not only ITRSs, but also other extensions with pre-defined functions can be | Not only ITRSs, but also other extensions with pre-defined functions can be | ||
| − | represented using this extension of the XTC format. | + | represented using this extension of the XTC format. A formal definition of ITRSs and their evaluation can be found |
| + | in [http://verify.rwth-aachen.de/giesl/papers/idp-distribute.pdf this paper]. | ||
[http://lists.lri.fr/pipermail/termtools/2009-October/000775.html full text of the proposal] | [http://lists.lri.fr/pipermail/termtools/2009-October/000775.html full text of the proposal] | ||
[[Category:Categories]] | [[Category:Categories]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 17 June 2014
The main idea of ITRSs is to add pre-defined constructors for integers (the integers themselves) and Booleans (true / false) and arithmetic, relational and Boolean functions like
+, -, *,/ ,%, >, >=, <, &&, ||, !, ...
to conventional TRSs using the innermost rewrite strategy. To this aim it is necessary to extend the XTC format by the ability to represent pre-defined semantics for function symbols. Not only ITRSs, but also other extensions with pre-defined functions can be represented using this extension of the XTC format. A formal definition of ITRSs and their evaluation can be found in this paper.
