Difference between revisions of "Term Rewriting"
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** Quoted identifiers must not contain whitespace, parantheses, or semicolons. | ** Quoted identifiers must not contain whitespace, parantheses, or semicolons. | ||
** All occurrences of the same identifier must be either quoted or unquoted. So <pre>(rule |a| |a|)</pre> is valid, but <pre>(rule a |a|)</pre> is invalid. | ** All occurrences of the same identifier must be either quoted or unquoted. So <pre>(rule |a| |a|)</pre> is valid, but <pre>(rule a |a|)</pre> is invalid. | ||
+ | ** Use sane identifiers. For example, <pre>a->a</pre> is a valid identifier, but it will cause confusion, so using it is a bad idea. | ||
* Rules are annotated with optional costs, which are natural numbers. This allows, e.g., to model relative rewriting (by setting the cost of relative rules to 0). Categories may disallow costs. So rules are defined as follows: | * Rules are annotated with optional costs, which are natural numbers. This allows, e.g., to model relative rewriting (by setting the cost of relative rules to 0). Categories may disallow costs. So rules are defined as follows: | ||
<pre> | <pre> |
Latest revision as of 07:37, 15 July 2024
Contents
General
We use an adaption of the ARI format, so TRSs are represented as S-Expressions (see here, Sec. 3.1). Our format differs from the format used at CoCo as follows:
- We do not impose any variable conditions, so a rewrite rule is a pair of arbitrary terms.
- Identifiers must be valid SMT-LIB symbols (see here, Sec. 3.2), whereas CoCo uses a more liberal definition. Both simple and quoted symbols are allowed. As in SMT-LIB, simple symbols must not be equal to reserved words. In our case, the reserved words are:
fun, rule, format, sort, theory, define-fun, prule, ->
To ease parsing, we impose the following additional restrictions:- Quoted identifiers must be non-empty.
- Quoted identifiers must not contain whitespace, parantheses, or semicolons.
- All occurrences of the same identifier must be either quoted or unquoted. So
(rule |a| |a|)
is valid, but(rule a |a|)
is invalid. - Use sane identifiers. For example,
a->a
is a valid identifier, but it will cause confusion, so using it is a bad idea.
- Rules are annotated with optional costs, which are natural numbers. This allows, e.g., to model relative rewriting (by setting the cost of relative rules to 0). Categories may disallow costs. So rules are defined as follows:
rule ::= ( rule term term cost? ) cost ::= :cost number
In contrast to the former XTC format, the goal of the analysis is implicitly specified by the category.
Termination
All termination categories consider termination w.r.t. arbitrary start terms.
Relative Termination
All categories for relative termination consider full rewriting. See here for the format of all categories for relative termination.
TRS Relative
- no further restrictions
SRS Relative
- just unary function symbols
Non-Relative Termination
All categories for non-relative termination disallow costs.
TRS Standard
- full rewriting
- see here
SRS Standard
- full rewriting
- just unary function symbols
- see here
TRS Contextsensitive
- context-sensitive rewriting
- see here
TRS Equational
Here, a theory may be added to declarations of function symbols.
fun ::= ( fun identifier number theory? ) theory ::= :theory [A | C | AC]
- full rewriting modulo associativity / commutativity / associativity and commutativity
TRS Innermost
- innermost rewriting
- see here
TRS Outermost
- outermost rewriting
- see here
TRS Conditional
- full conditional rewriting
- see here
- currently, we only support the condition-type oriented
TRS Conditional - Operational Termination
- TODO clarify the difference to TRS Conditional
- see here
- currently, we only support the condition-type oriented
Complexity
See here for all complexity categories.
Runtime Complexity
All categories for runtime complexity consider basic start terms only.
Runtime Complexity Innermost
- innermost rewriting
Runtime Complexity Full
- full rewriting
Derivational Complexity
All categories for derivational complexity consider arbitrary start terms.
Derivational Complexity Innermost
- innermost rewriting
Derivational Complexity Full
- full rewriting