Difference between revisions of "Termination Competition 2014 Registration"

From Termination-Portal.org
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
== Participants ==
 
== Participants ==
  
registrations, by (meta-)categories. last updated Sat Jun 14 11:42:05 CEST 2014
+
registrations, by (meta-)categories. last updated Sat Jun 14 16:30:38 CEST 2014
  
 
(This list to be edited by the competition organizer only. Please send email in case of any errors or omissions.)
 
(This list to be edited by the competition organizer only. Please send email in case of any errors or omissions.)

Revision as of 14:31, 14 June 2014

Procedure

Registration (by June 15)

  • get an account on starexec
  • send to the organizer, in email, the name of your solver and the categories that you want to enter

Solver pre-submission (by June 22) and submission (by July 1)

  • upload your solver to starexec. In your solver description on starexec, give: name of solver, name and affiliation of (main) author(s), URL for more detail.
  • send to the organizer, in email, for each of your categories, the pair of solver-id and configuration-id. You can send preliminary id pairs, you can update them until July 1.

Benchmark submission (by July 1)

  • upload benchmarks on starexec (in some subspace of your space)
  • send to organizer, in email, the pathname of this subspace

Note: for the above to work, I need to have read access to your space (your solver, your benchmarks). One method for granting access is described here http://starexec.forumotion.com/t80-how-can-the-space-leader-use-non-public-solvers#189 , I hope there's a less roundabout way. (It seems there is not, so you should: create a subspace of your space, put your solver there, and also copy me to this subspace. I will then link to your solver, from the space where I actually run the experiments/competition.)

Participants

registrations, by (meta-)categories. last updated Sat Jun 14 16:30:38 CEST 2014

(This list to be edited by the competition organizer only. Please send email in case of any errors or omissions.)

  • Termination of Term Rewriting (and Transition Systems)
    • TRS Standard: TTT2, NaTT, AProVE, Wanda
    • SRS Standard: TTT2, NaTT, AProVE
    • TRS Relative: TTT2, AProVE
    • SRS Relative: TTT2, AProVE
    • TRS Standard certified: TTT2, matchbox, AProVE
    • SRS Standard certified: TTT2, matchbox, AProVE
    • TRS Relative certified: TTT2, AProVE
    • SRS Relative certified: TTT2, AProVE
    • TRS Equational: AProVE
    • TRS Conditional: AProVE
    • TRS Context Sensitive: AProVE
    • TRS Innermost: AProVE
    • TRS Outermost: AProVE
    • TRS Innermost certified: AProVE
    • TRS Outermost certified: AProVE
    • Higher-Order rewriting (union beta): Wanda
    • integer transition systems: T2, AProVE, Ctrl
    • Integer TRS: AProVE
  • Complexity Analysis of Term Rewriting
    • Derivational Complexity - Full Rewriting: TCT, CaT
    • Runtime Complexity – Full Rewriting: TCT, CaT
    • Runtime Complexity – Innermost Rewriting: TCT, AProVE
    • Derivational Complexity - Full Rewriting certified: CaT
    • Runtime Complexity – Full Rewriting certified: CaT
    • Runtime Complexity – Innermost Rewriting certified: AProVE
  • Termination of Programming Languages
    • C: AProVE, T2, Ultimate Buchi Automizer
    • Java: AProVE, Julia
    • Logic Programming: AProVE
    • Functional Programming: AProVE
  • Verification of Termination of Term Rewriting
    • TRS Standard: CeTA, Rainbow
    • TRS Relative: CeTA
    • TRS Innermost: CeTA
    • TRS Outermost: CeTA
    • TRS Conditional: CeTA
    • TRS Context-Sensitive: CeTA
    • SRS Standard: CeTA
    • SRS Relative: CeTA
  • Verification of Complexity Analysis of Term Rewriting:
    • Derivational Complexity - Full Rewriting: CeTA
    • Runtime Complexity – Full Rewriting: CeTA

Note on Certified Categories

  • Participants of a certified category need to state which verifier they are targetting (it could be several).
  • Writers of verifiers need to state the syntax and semantics of the certificates that they are accepting (e.g., by publishing their verifier specification and/or implementation, with exact version information)

Note: on starexec, you can choose "ceta-postproc" to get immediate verification (by an earlier CeTA version, and with some extra problems, see https://github.com/jwaldmann/ceta-postproc/issues )

Nothing

(nothing here, except "Four or more headings cause a table of contents to be generated automatically.")